Secure.com vs Torq
Torq is a security hyperautomation platform with an agentic AI SOC that triages, investigates, and remediates alerts. Secure.com's SOC Teammate closes the loop: investigate, act, retest, prove, under your team's approval.
Last reviewed: September 2026
- 200+ integrations
- Bring your own stack
- Human approval on every action
The short version
Choose Secure.com's SOC Teammate if you want alerts carried to a proven fix under an approval gate, with offense findings shaping what gets worked first.
Torq automates the incident lifecycle with agentic AI SOC agents that act within the guardrails you set. Secure.com's SOC Teammate carries the case further. It investigates, executes governed remediation, retests, and preserves the proof, and every consequential action is scoped, permissioned, and gated by your team's approval rules, with a complete audit trail. Offense sharpens it: the Red Teammate's validated attack-path findings feed what the SOC works first. In Secure.com's buyer research, AI-governance concerns surfaced unprompted in 8 of 14 interviews.
Your team sets the rules. The Teammate works inside them.
Who each option is for
Choose Secure.com if
- You want alerts carried to a proven, retested fix, not just automated at speed.
- An approval gate on every consequential action is a requirement, not a setting to configure.
- You want offense-side findings from a Red Teammate shaping SOC prioritization.
Choose Torq if
- You want a build-it-your-way hyperautomation platform with no-code, low-code, and full-code workflows.
- Broad security automation across many tools and use cases is the priority today.
- Agentic SOC agents that act within your guardrails on a human-on-the-loop model fit your team.
Why automation alone leaves gaps
An AI SOC that triages and remediates faster is real progress. Speed without offensive validation and clear approval boundaries still leaves gaps the team has to close. They show up fast.
Defense without offense.
Triage is driven by inbound alerts and telemetry, with no validated attack-path findings shaping what the team works first.
Autonomy without a boundary.
When AI acts on its own judgment, consequential actions need an approval gate the team sets, reviews, and can defend later.
Speed without proof.
Fast remediation still needs a retest and before and after evidence to show the risk was actually reduced.
Governance you can defend.
When AI acts, scope, permissions, approvals, and an audit trail have to be demonstrable to a CISO or auditor, not assumed.
AI Teammates attack your defenses, harden what they find, and hand your team back hundreds of hours every month.
What gaps Secure.com fills
Offense-informed defense
The Red Teammate's validated attack-path findings feed SOC prioritization directly. Torq has no offense-side product informing its triage.
A finding validated by attack
Secure.com attacks within scope, then hardens, retests, and proves the fix held. Torq automates response, but nothing pressure tests the defenses first.
One team across the lifecycle
The SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates share one live context. Torq focuses on security operations automation on the defensive side.
Governed by design
Scope, permissions, approval, and evidence are the Teammate's operating model. Torq runs agentic and deterministic workflows your team builds and oversees.
Start with one Teammate
One function owns a complete, provable outcome on day one. Torq is a platform you adopt and expand across use cases.
The full comparison
Three views: what each does, how each deploys, and where each fits. Every cell is a real sentence, not a checkmark.
Table A — By capability
Secure.com vs. Torq — AI SOC capability comparison (2026).
| Evaluation layer | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Assigned to a defined function, environment, or workflow, with no open-ended reach. | A platform for building and running automations across your security stack. |
| Context | Reasons from one shared model of your assets, identities, risk, cases, and policy. | Builds a context graph of your environment from connected tools and case history. |
| Permissions | Read, recommend, write, execute, and remediate privileges are explicit and separable. | Actions run through the workflows and guardrails your team configures. |
| Approval | Consequential actions pause at a human gate; lower risk work proceeds within policy. | Agents act within guardrails on a human-on-the-loop model. |
| Alert investigation | Investigates and carries the case to a retested, proven closure. | Agentic AI triages, investigates, and enriches alerts across your stack. |
| Response execution | Executes governed remediation behind an approval gate, not just a runbook. | Automates and remediates across the incident lifecycle at machine speed. |
| Retest and proof | Retests after remediation and preserves before and after evidence. | Remediates at speed and records decisions in its context graph. |
| Offense signal | The Red Teammate's validated attack-path findings feed SOC prioritization. | Prioritization is driven by inbound alerts and telemetry; no offense-side product is marketed at the time of review. |
| Data handling | Customer data stays within your configured scope and policy boundaries. | Torq's data-handling and model-training terms are not stated in its public materials at the time of review. |
Table B — By deployment
Secure.com vs. Torq — deployment and operating model (2026).
| Dimension | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Sits above your existing stack; no rip and replace. | Cloud-native platform that connects across your security stack. |
| Operating model | Self operated, Expert Activation, or fully managed by Secure.com. | Self operated; you build and run the automations your way. |
| Time to first value | Live in days via Forward-Deployed Engineers for a guaranteed first value. | Depends on the workflows and agents your team builds and tunes. |
| How work is built | One Teammate owns a function; you approve, it acts. | No-code, low-code, and full-code workflows, plus agentic HyperAgents. |
| Integration breadth | 200+ integrations across SIEM, EDR, IAM, cloud, and ticketing. | Broad integration coverage, with AI-generated integrations across the stack. |
| Pricing model | Custom quote through a sales conversation; start with one Teammate. | Usage-based enterprise pricing, per public materials at the time of review. |
Table C — By use case coverage
Secure.com vs. Torq — use case coverage (2026).
| Use case | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Torq |
|---|---|---|
| Alert triage | Yes. Full triage through governed response. | Yes. Agentic auto triage is a core strength. |
| Investigation and response | Yes. Investigates and executes governed response, not just a workflow. | Yes. Agentic investigation and automated response across the stack. |
| Offensive validation | Yes. The Red Teammate validates attack paths and feeds SOC prioritization. | Not in scope. Torq is a defensive SOC automation platform. |
| Fix, retest, and proof | Yes. Hardens what is found and retests to prove the fix held. | Remediates at machine speed across the incident lifecycle. |
| Broad security automation | Coordinated across the SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates. | Yes. Hyperautomation across many security and IT use cases. |
| Audit and evidence | Every action logged to a SOC 2 aligned audit trail. | Captures verdicts, decisions, exceptions, and overrides with context. |
Switch to Secure.com without rebuilding your SOC
You don't replace your stack to start. You add one Teammate to the tools you already run and expand only once it earns the next step.
Find the right starting point
A security context discovery maps your environment and recommends the first Teammate to deploy.
Reach first value with experts
Forward-Deployed Engineers configure and tune against a guaranteed time to value.
Keep your stack
200+ integrations mean no rip and replace of the SIEM, EDR, or IAM you already run.
Expand when ready
Add Teammates across offense and defense as trust and ROI are established.
Frequently Asked Questions
See the SOC Teammate
close the loop
Start with one Teammate on your existing stack. Live in days, governed by your rules, proven with evidence.
This comparison reflects publicly available information about Torq as of September 2026. Secure.com is not affiliated with Torq. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
See how Secure.com compares with the rest of your shortlist
Every comparison follows the same structure, so you can weigh what each tool does, how it deploys, and where it fits on equal terms.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs BlinkOps
BlinkOps lets teams build AI agents and workflows. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs D3 Security
D3 Morpheus is an accountable agentic SOC with approval gates. Secure.com's SOC Teammate does that too, then adds offense, fixes, and a retest.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Dropzone AI
Dropzone AI investigates alerts to a verdict. Secure.com's SOC Teammate investigates, acts, retests, and proves it, with human approval on every action.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Exaforce
Exaforce is an agentic SOC on its own data layer. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works above your stack and adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Intezer
Intezer investigates every alert at forensic depth. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the queue too, and offense decides what comes first.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Prophet Security
Prophet AI investigates every alert. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the same queue, with offense deciding what gets worked first and fixes proven.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Swimlane
Swimlane routes every alert to the right level of AI. Secure.com's SOC Teammate adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest to prove each fix.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Tines
Tines is a workflow platform every team builds on. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Apiiro
Apiiro maps code risk with Deep Code Analysis. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit, inside one team.
- Application security
Secure.com vs ArmorCode
ArmorCode correlates findings from 400+ tools. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks to prove risk, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Cycode
Cycode is an agentic AppSec platform with native scanners. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit.
- Application security
Secure.com vs OX Security
OX Security spans AI governance, code, pentesting, and cloud. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Snyk
Snyk is a developer-first AI security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC to the loop.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Defender for Cloud is a CNAPP inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Orca Security
Orca is a leading agentless cloud security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud links broad cloud security to Palo Alto's SOC. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Sysdig Secure
Sysdig Secure is a runtime CNAPP built on Falco. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Wiz
Wiz connects code, cloud, and runtime in one graph. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Astra Security
Astra pairs automated scanning with certified pentesters. Secure.com validates exploitable risk too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs AttackIQ
AttackIQ's AVA Agentic OS runs validation missions. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Cymulate
Cymulate validates exposure and pushes updates to your controls. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team fixes the root cause.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs NodeZero
NodeZero proves exploitable attack paths. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves them too, then executes the governed fix and retests to prove it held.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Pentera
Pentera validates what is exploitable. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates it too, then carries the finding to a governed, retested fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Picus Security
Picus proves what attackers can exploit and what your defenses stop. Secure.com validates that too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Radiant Security
Radiant Security delivers point-in-time pen tests and a report. Secure.com's Red Teammate tests continuously, hardens findings, and retests to prove the fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs RidgeBot
RidgeBot safely exploits vulnerabilities across your IT environment. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, then a team fixes each finding.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs SafeBreach
SafeBreach runs CTEM on breach and attack simulation. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs XBOW
XBOW proves exploitability across web apps and APIs. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves it too, then a team fixes the root cause.
- Security platform
Secure.com vs CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike Falcon runs an agentic SOC on its platform. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates working above your stack, including Falcon.