Secure.com vs OX Security
OX Security is a prompt to runtime platform spanning AI governance, code security, agentic pentesting, and cloud. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC to the loop.
Last reviewed: September 2026
- Whole-environment SOC
- Above your stack
- Human approval on every action
The short version
Choose Secure.com if you want application and cloud security joined to a SOC that works across your whole environment, under one approval model.
OX Security is a prompt to runtime platform. It governs AI coding tools with VibeSec, secures code with OX Code, validates exploitability with an agentic pentester, and protects cloud runtime with OX Cloud, all linked back to source. Secure.com overlaps on much of that loop. The difference is reach: the SOC Teammate triages and responds across endpoints, identities, and SIEM alerts, not only applications and cloud, and every consequential action runs under your approval rules. In Secure.com's buyer research, grunt work surfaced in 10 of 14 interviews.
Your team sets the rules. The Teammate works inside them.
Who each option is for
Choose Secure.com if
- You want a SOC Teammate that triages and responds across endpoints, identities, and SIEM alerts.
- You want every consequential action behind an approval gate your team configures.
- You want to start with one Teammate, with Expert Activation or a fully managed option.
Choose OX Security if
- You want one platform from prompt to runtime: AI governance, code security, pentesting, and cloud.
- Tracing every exploitable exposure back to the exact repository, file, and commit is the priority.
- You want a Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader for software supply chain security.
Why application security isn't the whole SOC
Connecting the prompt, the code, the pentest, and the cloud in one context is a genuine advantage, and OX delivers it. But much of what a SOC handles never touches your code. The gaps show up fast.
Not every attack starts in code.
Phishing, stolen credentials, and endpoint malware start outside the codebase and need a SOC that sees them.
Runtime response, not the whole queue.
Investigating runtime anomalies in the cloud is one part of incident response. Alerts from endpoints, identity, and email are another.
Proving exploits, or proving detections.
Pentesting applications proves what is exploitable. Testing whether your detections fire on an attack is a separate job.
One platform is a program.
Consolidating onto one platform is a major effort. Adding one Teammate above your stack is a smaller first step.
AI Teammates attack your defenses, harden what they find, and hand your team back hundreds of hours every month.
What gaps Secure.com fills
A SOC across your whole environment
The SOC Teammate triages endpoint, identity, and SIEM alerts, not only application events. OX Cloud investigates runtime anomalies in cloud workloads.
Offense that tests your detections
The Red Teammate emulates adversaries and checks that detections fire. OX Agentic Pentester proves application exploitability and links it to code.
Governed by an approval gate
Every consequential action pauses for your team's approval before it runs. OX enforces policy from the prompt to runtime.
Expert help to first value
Expert Activation or a fully managed option, with a guaranteed time to value. OX is self operated, with a success manager on Enterprise plans.
Start with one Teammate
One function owns a complete, provable outcome above your stack. OX is a platform you adopt across code, pipelines, and cloud.
The full comparison
Three views: what each does, how each deploys, and where each fits. Every cell is a real sentence, not a checkmark.
Table A — By capability
Secure.com vs. OX Security — application security comparison (2026).
| Evaluation layer | Secure.com (AI Teammates) | OX Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | A governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense. | A prompt to runtime platform for the agentic development lifecycle. |
| Code security | The AppSec Teammate ties findings to exploitability and fixes. | OX Code runs SAST, SCA, and secrets scanning with reachability context. |
| Offensive testing | The Red Teammate tests exposure, emulates adversaries, and validates detections. | OX Agentic Pentester validates exploitability and links it to code. |
| Cloud | The Cloud Teammate hardens posture under approval. | OX Cloud covers CSPM, KSPM, DSPM, runtime vulnerabilities, and attack paths. |
| Incident response | The SOC Teammate triages and responds across endpoints, identities, and SIEM alerts. | Runtime Events investigates runtime anomalies in cloud workloads. |
| Approval model | Consequential actions pause at a human gate; lower risk work proceeds within policy. | OX's controls for gating autonomous actions are not stated in its public materials at the time of review. |
| Context | Shared context across the SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates. | A single context lake traces each finding back to its source. |
| Data handling | Customer data stays within your configured scope and policy boundaries. | OX's data-handling terms are not stated in its public materials at the time of review. |
Table B — By deployment
Secure.com vs. OX Security — deployment and operating model (2026).
| Dimension | Secure.com (AI Teammates) | OX Security |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Sits above your existing stack; no rip and replace. | Agentless connection to existing tools; runtime agents on Enterprise. |
| Operating model | Self operated, Expert Activation, or fully managed by Secure.com. | Self operated, with a dedicated success manager on Enterprise. |
| Time to first value | Live in days via Forward-Deployed Engineers for a guaranteed first value. | Early insights after connecting source control and CI/CD. |
| Third-party tools | Works across vendors through 200+ integrations. | Connects to source control, CI/CD, ticketing, and cloud tools. |
| Breadth | Offense plus defense across the SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates. | AI governance, code, pentesting, and cloud on one platform. |
| Pricing model | Custom quote through a sales conversation; start with one Teammate. | Tiered by developer count, Enterprise custom quoted. |
Table C — By use case coverage
Secure.com vs. OX Security — use case coverage (2026).
| Use case | Secure.com (AI Teammates) | OX Security |
|---|---|---|
| Application security | The AppSec Teammate prioritizes by proven exploitability. | Yes. Code security with reachability is a core strength. |
| Application pentesting | Yes. The Red Teammate tests within your approved scope. | Yes. Continuous agentic pentesting linked to code. |
| Detection validation | Yes. The Red Teammate checks that detections fire. | Not a stated capability at the time of review. |
| Cloud security | The Cloud Teammate hardens posture under approval. | Yes. OX Cloud provides CNAPP coverage. |
| Whole-environment SOC | Yes. Triage and response across endpoints, identities, and SIEM. | Runtime and cloud focused; endpoint and identity alerts run elsewhere. |
Add the team without rebuilding your stack
You don't replace your AppSec program to start. You add one Teammate to the tools you already run and expand only once it earns the next step.
Find the right starting point
A security context discovery maps your environment and recommends the first Teammate to deploy.
Reach first value with experts
Expert Activation configures and tunes the first Teammate against a guaranteed time to value.
Keep your stack
200+ integrations mean no rip and replace of the SIEM, EDR, IAM, or cloud tools you already run.
Expand when ready
Add Teammates across offense and defense as trust and ROI are established.
Frequently Asked Questions
See the Teammates
close the loop
Start with one Teammate on your existing stack. Attack, harden, prove, and retest, governed by your rules.
This comparison reflects publicly available information about OX Security as of September 2026. Secure.com is not affiliated with OX Security. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
See how Secure.com compares with the rest of your shortlist
Every comparison follows the same structure, so you can weigh what each tool does, how it deploys, and where it fits on equal terms.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Apiiro
Apiiro maps code risk with Deep Code Analysis. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit, inside one team.
- Application security
Secure.com vs ArmorCode
ArmorCode correlates findings from 400+ tools. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks to prove risk, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Cycode
Cycode is an agentic AppSec platform with native scanners. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Snyk
Snyk is a developer-first AI security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC to the loop.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs BlinkOps
BlinkOps lets teams build AI agents and workflows. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs D3 Security
D3 Morpheus is an accountable agentic SOC with approval gates. Secure.com's SOC Teammate does that too, then adds offense, fixes, and a retest.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Dropzone AI
Dropzone AI investigates alerts to a verdict. Secure.com's SOC Teammate investigates, acts, retests, and proves it, with human approval on every action.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Exaforce
Exaforce is an agentic SOC on its own data layer. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works above your stack and adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Intezer
Intezer investigates every alert at forensic depth. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the queue too, and offense decides what comes first.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Prophet Security
Prophet AI investigates every alert. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the same queue, with offense deciding what gets worked first and fixes proven.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Swimlane
Swimlane routes every alert to the right level of AI. Secure.com's SOC Teammate adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest to prove each fix.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Tines
Tines is a workflow platform every team builds on. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Torq
Torq automates the incident lifecycle. Secure.com's SOC Teammate investigates, acts, retests, and proves the fix, with human approval on every action.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Defender for Cloud is a CNAPP inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Orca Security
Orca is a leading agentless cloud security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud links broad cloud security to Palo Alto's SOC. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Sysdig Secure
Sysdig Secure is a runtime CNAPP built on Falco. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Wiz
Wiz connects code, cloud, and runtime in one graph. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Astra Security
Astra pairs automated scanning with certified pentesters. Secure.com validates exploitable risk too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs AttackIQ
AttackIQ's AVA Agentic OS runs validation missions. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Cymulate
Cymulate validates exposure and pushes updates to your controls. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team fixes the root cause.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs NodeZero
NodeZero proves exploitable attack paths. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves them too, then executes the governed fix and retests to prove it held.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Pentera
Pentera validates what is exploitable. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates it too, then carries the finding to a governed, retested fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Picus Security
Picus proves what attackers can exploit and what your defenses stop. Secure.com validates that too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Radiant Security
Radiant Security delivers point-in-time pen tests and a report. Secure.com's Red Teammate tests continuously, hardens findings, and retests to prove the fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs RidgeBot
RidgeBot safely exploits vulnerabilities across your IT environment. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, then a team fixes each finding.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs SafeBreach
SafeBreach runs CTEM on breach and attack simulation. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs XBOW
XBOW proves exploitability across web apps and APIs. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves it too, then a team fixes the root cause.
- Security platform
Secure.com vs CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike Falcon runs an agentic SOC on its platform. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates working above your stack, including Falcon.