Secure.com vs Exaforce
Exaforce is a full-lifecycle agentic SOC built on its own data layer and knowledge graph, sold as a platform or as MDR. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works above your stack and adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest.
Last reviewed: September 2026
- Offense-informed defense
- Bring your own stack
- Human approval on every action
The short version
Choose Secure.com's SOC Teammate if you want AI on top of the stack you already run, with offense shaping priorities and every fix retested to prove it held.
Exaforce is an agentic SOC platform built on a unified data layer and a real-time knowledge graph. Its Exabots detect, triage, investigate, and respond across cloud, identity, SaaS, endpoint, and email, with natural-language threat hunting, and it can run alongside your SIEM or replace it, self-operated or as a 24/7 MDR. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works above the SIEM, EDR, and identity stack you already run. The Red Teammate proves what is exploitable, and the Cloud and AppSec Teammates fix the root cause and retest, every consequential action under your approval.
Your team sets the rules. The Teammate works inside them.
Who each option is for
Choose Secure.com if
- You want AI that works above the SIEM, EDR, and identity tools you already run.
- You want offense from a Red Teammate to shape what the SOC works first.
- You want the root cause fixed and retested by the Cloud and AppSec Teammates, not only the alert closed.
Choose Exaforce if
- You want a full-lifecycle agentic SOC on its own data layer that can run alongside or replace your SIEM.
- You want the platform self-operated, or as a 24/7 MDR where Exaforce analysts run the Exabots.
- You want deep cloud and identity coverage, backed by AWS Security and AI Competency.
Why a new SOC platform isn't the whole loop
A full-lifecycle SOC on a real-time knowledge graph is a genuine advantage, and Exaforce delivers it. But adopting a new data layer is a big move, and closing an alert is not the same as hardening the environment. The gaps show up fast.
A new data layer to adopt.
Ingesting telemetry into a new knowledge graph is a platform decision. Working above your current SIEM is a smaller first step.
Defense without offense.
Detection starts from what attackers have already done. Validated attack paths show what is exploitable before they try.
Closed alerts, not hardened systems.
Response contains the threat. Fixing the misconfiguration or flaw that let it in is a separate job.
Proof the fix held.
A resolved incident shows the threat was handled. A retest shows the risk is actually gone.
AI Teammates attack your defenses, harden what they find, and hand your team back hundreds of hours every month.
What gaps Secure.com fills
Offense-informed defense
The Red Teammate's validated attack paths shape what the SOC works first. Exaforce has no offense-side product.
Above the stack you already run
The Teammates work on top of your current SIEM, EDR, and identity tools. Exaforce brings its own data layer and can replace your SIEM.
Root cause, not only the alert
The Cloud and AppSec Teammates fix the flaw behind an alert under approval. Exaforce focuses on detection through response.
Retest and proof of the fix
The platform retests after remediation and keeps before and after evidence. Exaforce closes the loop from detection to response.
One team across offense and defense
The SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates share one live context. Exabots cover the SOC lifecycle.
The full comparison
Three views: what each does, how each deploys, and where each fits. Every cell is a real sentence, not a checkmark.
Table A — By capability
Secure.com vs. Exaforce — AI SOC capability comparison (2026).
| Evaluation layer | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Exaforce |
|---|---|---|
| Category | A governed SOC Teammate inside a team of AI Teammates. | An agentic SOC platform and modern SIEM, also offered as MDR. |
| Data layer | Works on your existing SIEM, EDR, and identity data through 200+ integrations. | Its own unified data layer and real-time knowledge graph, correlated at ingest. |
| Detection | Works the alerts your existing tools raise. | Exabots run detection on the knowledge graph. |
| Investigation | Investigates and carries the case to a retested, proven closure. | Exabots triage and investigate, with natural-language threat hunting. |
| Autonomy and control | Consequential actions pause at a human gate; lower risk work proceeds within policy. | Autonomous, assisted, or human-led modes, with an agent kill switch. |
| Response | Executes governed remediation behind an approval gate. | Exabots orchestrate response across connected tools. |
| Offense signal | The Red Teammate's validated attack paths feed prioritization. | No offense-side product; priority comes from detections. |
| Retest and proof | Retests after remediation and preserves before and after evidence. | Retesting a fix after response is not a stated capability for Exaforce at the time of review. |
| Data handling | Customer data stays within your configured scope and policy boundaries. | Exaforce's data-handling terms are not stated in its public materials at the time of review. |
Table B — By deployment
Secure.com vs. Exaforce — deployment and operating model (2026).
| Dimension | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Exaforce |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Sits above your existing stack; no rip and replace. | Runs alongside your SIEM or replaces it. |
| Operating model | Self operated, Expert Activation, or fully managed by Secure.com. | Self-operated, or a 24/7 MDR run by Exaforce analysts. |
| Coverage | Offense plus defense across the SOC, Red, AppSec, and Cloud Teammates. | Cloud, identity, SaaS, endpoint, and email. |
| Integrations | 200+ integrations across SIEM, EDR, IAM, cloud, and ticketing. | 100+ integrations, including GuardDuty, Okta, and GitHub. |
| Validation | A SOC 2 aligned audit trail across every action. | AWS Security Competency and AWS AI Competency. |
| Pricing model | Custom quote through a sales conversation; start with one Teammate. | Platform and MDR are quoted separately. |
Table C — By use case coverage
Secure.com vs. Exaforce — use case coverage (2026).
| Use case | Secure.com (SOC Teammate) | Exaforce |
|---|---|---|
| Alert triage | Yes. Full triage through governed response. | Yes. Exabots triage every alert. |
| SIEM replacement | Not the focus. Secure.com works above your SIEM. | Yes. It can replace your SIEM. |
| Managed SOC | A fully managed option is available. | Yes. A 24/7 MDR with Exaforce analysts. |
| Offensive validation | Yes. The Red Teammate validates attack paths. | Not in scope. Exaforce is an agentic SOC. |
| Root cause remediation | Yes. The Cloud and AppSec Teammates harden under approval. | Focused on detection through response. |
| Retest and proof | Yes. Retests to prove the fix held. | Not a stated capability at the time of review. |
Switch to Secure.com without rebuilding your SOC
You don't replace your stack to start. You add one Teammate to the tools you already run and expand only once it earns the next step.
Find the right starting point
A security context discovery maps your environment and recommends the first Teammate to deploy.
Reach first value with experts
Forward-Deployed Engineers configure and tune against a guaranteed time to value.
Keep your stack
200+ integrations mean no rip and replace of the SIEM, EDR, or IAM you already run.
Expand when ready
Add Teammates across offense and defense as trust and ROI are established.
Frequently Asked Questions
See the SOC Teammate
close the loop
Start with one Teammate on your existing stack. Live in days, governed by your rules, proven with evidence.
This comparison reflects publicly available information about Exaforce as of September 2026. Secure.com is not affiliated with Exaforce. All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
See how Secure.com compares with the rest of your shortlist
Every comparison follows the same structure, so you can weigh what each tool does, how it deploys, and where it fits on equal terms.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs BlinkOps
BlinkOps lets teams build AI agents and workflows. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs D3 Security
D3 Morpheus is an accountable agentic SOC with approval gates. Secure.com's SOC Teammate does that too, then adds offense, fixes, and a retest.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Dropzone AI
Dropzone AI investigates alerts to a verdict. Secure.com's SOC Teammate investigates, acts, retests, and proves it, with human approval on every action.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Intezer
Intezer investigates every alert at forensic depth. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the queue too, and offense decides what comes first.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Prophet Security
Prophet AI investigates every alert. Secure.com's SOC Teammate works the same queue, with offense deciding what gets worked first and fixes proven.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Swimlane
Swimlane routes every alert to the right level of AI. Secure.com's SOC Teammate adds offense, root cause fixes, and a retest to prove each fix.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Tines
Tines is a workflow platform every team builds on. Secure.com gives you a team of AI Teammates that already own and run the security work.
- AI SOC
Secure.com vs Torq
Torq automates the incident lifecycle. Secure.com's SOC Teammate investigates, acts, retests, and proves the fix, with human approval on every action.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Apiiro
Apiiro maps code risk with Deep Code Analysis. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit, inside one team.
- Application security
Secure.com vs ArmorCode
ArmorCode correlates findings from 400+ tools. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks to prove risk, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Cycode
Cycode is an agentic AppSec platform with native scanners. Secure.com's AppSec Teammate ties code risk to what an attacker can actually exploit.
- Application security
Secure.com vs OX Security
OX Security spans AI governance, code, pentesting, and cloud. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC.
- Application security
Secure.com vs Snyk
Snyk is a developer-first AI security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates that adds a whole-environment SOC to the loop.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Defender for Cloud is a CNAPP inside the Microsoft ecosystem. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Orca Security
Orca is a leading agentless cloud security platform. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Prisma Cloud
Prisma Cloud links broad cloud security to Palo Alto's SOC. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates that works above your stack.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Sysdig Secure
Sysdig Secure is a runtime CNAPP built on Falco. Secure.com is a team of AI Teammates that attacks, fixes, and responds under your approval.
- Cloud security
Secure.com vs Wiz
Wiz connects code, cloud, and runtime in one graph. Secure.com is a governed team of AI Teammates across offense and defense, over your whole environment.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Astra Security
Astra pairs automated scanning with certified pentesters. Secure.com validates exploitable risk too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs AttackIQ
AttackIQ's AVA Agentic OS runs validation missions. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Cymulate
Cymulate validates exposure and pushes updates to your controls. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team fixes the root cause.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs NodeZero
NodeZero proves exploitable attack paths. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves them too, then executes the governed fix and retests to prove it held.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Pentera
Pentera validates what is exploitable. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates it too, then carries the finding to a governed, retested fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Picus Security
Picus proves what attackers can exploit and what your defenses stop. Secure.com validates that too, and runs live defensive operations as well.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs Radiant Security
Radiant Security delivers point-in-time pen tests and a report. Secure.com's Red Teammate tests continuously, hardens findings, and retests to prove the fix.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs RidgeBot
RidgeBot safely exploits vulnerabilities across your IT environment. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, then a team fixes each finding.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs SafeBreach
SafeBreach runs CTEM on breach and attack simulation. Secure.com's Red Teammate validates too, and a team executes the fix at the root.
- Offensive security
Secure.com vs XBOW
XBOW proves exploitability across web apps and APIs. Secure.com's Red Teammate proves it too, then a team fixes the root cause.
- Security platform
Secure.com vs CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike Falcon runs an agentic SOC on its platform. Secure.com is a vendor-neutral team of AI Teammates working above your stack, including Falcon.