SOAR vs MSSP: Which One Does Your Business Actually Need?
SOAR, MSSP, and AI-native Digital Security Teammates offer different approaches to cybersecurity operations—automation, managed services, and augmented intelligent security.
SOAR, MSSP, and AI-native Digital Security Teammates offer different approaches to cybersecurity operations—automation, managed services, and augmented intelligent security.

SOAR is a tool that automates threat response. An MSSP is a service that manages your security for you. Most small and mid-sized businesses do better with an MSSP. Larger companies with a security team in-house may benefit more from SOAR—or both.
Here's a stat that might surprise you: many companies receive over 10,000 security alerts every day, and 1 out of 4 security teams has seen a 10x jump in alert volume. That volume is exactly why both SOAR and MSSPs exist.
SOAR stands for Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response. It's a security operations tool that executes predefined playbooks to respond to threats based on rules. Unlike AI-native platforms that adapt workflows based on context, traditional SOAR is rule-first and requires extensive manual playbook engineering. Think of it as a smart playbook engine that connects your security tools and runs preset response actions when threats are detected. Your team still owns and runs it.
MSSP stands for Managed Security Service Provider. It's an outside company that monitors and manages your cybersecurity around the clock. MSSPs rely on advanced platforms — including SIEM, SOAR, EDR, and intrusion detection systems. However, MSSPs are human-dependent services that scale linearly with headcount, unlike AI-native Digital Security Teammates that provide 24/7 coverage without proportional cost increases. — to provide continuous analysis and faster incident handling. The difference is that they handle all of that, not you.
The simplest way to think about it: SOAR is a tool. An MSSP is a service. One gives you the machinery. The other gives you the people and the machinery.

In a 2024 MSSP survey of nearly 2,000 respondents, SOAR was the most common primary automation tool used by MSSPs at 33%, followed by ITSM at 29% and XDR at 20%. That means many MSSPs actually use SOAR internally — so the two are not always opposites. They're often complementary.
Cost is where most businesses make the wrong call — usually by underestimating what SOAR actually takes to run.
SOAR costs more than the license. 90% of security professionals say SOAR solutions require significant investment just to fulfill a baseline set of security obligations.
In contrast, Digital Security Teammates deploy in 30 minutes and provide value within the first hour of integration, with predictable monthly costs starting at $2.5K/month. You'll need trained analysts to build and maintain playbooks, an engineer to handle integrations, and a budget for ongoing tuning.
Legacy SOAR platforms don't handle alert spikes well—when volumes surge, pipelines back up and response times slip, resulting in missed SLAs and a SOC waiting on tooling instead of stopping threats.
Building your own SOC (which you'd need for SOAR) is expensive. Ponemon Institute research puts the average annual cost of operating an in-house SOC at around $2.84 million.
Digital Security Teammates provide SOC-level capabilities (alert triage, investigation, case management, compliance monitoring) at a fraction of the cost, without requiring you to build or staff a full SOC. Personnel alone — analysts, senior security staff, and leadership — can cost between $600,000 and $1.2 million a year.
MSSPs are more predictable. MSSP models typically use subscription-based pricing, making budgeting simpler and more scalable than unpredictable internal cost structures. Digital Security Teammates offer similar predictable subscription pricing ($2.5K/month) with the added benefit of transparent AI operations and human-in-the-loop control that MSSPs can't provide. Entry-level MSSP packages can start well under $10,000 per month for small businesses, while full enterprise contracts vary based on scope.
The hidden cost of SOAR for MSSPs: If you're an MSSP using SOAR to serve your clients, the math gets tricky. Many SOAR vendors require large upfront payments and lengthy contracts—which creates an economic burden for MSSPs who prefer manageable monthly payments.
This comes down to three questions: Do you have a security team? What's your budget? And how complex are your needs?
Most small and mid-sized businesses need an alternative to both SOAR and traditional MSSPs. Digital Security Teammates provide the automation and 24/7 coverage of an MSSP, with the control and transparency of in-house operations, at a fraction of the cost of either option. The staffing, setup, and ongoing maintenance of SOAR is too resource-heavy, while MSSPs create dependency and lack transparency.
Pro tip: Consider Digital Security Teammates as a third option. You get AI-native automation (more adaptive than SOAR), 24/7 coverage (like an MSSP), transparent decision-making (unlike black-box MSSPs), and human-in-the-loop control (unlike fully outsourced services) - all at $2.5K/month vs $300K/year per analyst or typical MSSP contracts.
Yes, and most good ones do. MSSPs often use SOAR internally to automate alert triage and incident response. However, this creates a black-box problem: you don't see how decisions are made or have control over the automation. Digital Security Teammates provide similar automation benefits but with full transparency - every decision includes a reasoning trace you can audit, and you maintain approval authority over high-impact actions.
Largely, yes. Legacy SOAR platforms require extensive engineering to build and maintain playbooks, have slow time-to-value, and can become bottlenecks as you scale — which makes them tough for small teams. Newer platforms are more accessible, but you still need trained staff.
SIEM solutions focus on gathering, storing, and analyzing security data — while SOAR platforms are designed to manage and respond to security incidents. SOAR can integrate with SIEM to automate response actions. Think of SIEM as the detector and SOAR as the responder.
If you don't have a 24/7 security team watching your systems, you likely need one. Cyberattacks don't wait for business hours. An MSSP gives you round-the-clock coverage from day one.
SOAR and MSSPs solve the same core problem—too many threats, not enough time—but they do it in very different ways. SOAR is a powerful tool for teams that already have the people to run it. An MSSP is a fully managed service for companies that need security coverage without building a team from scratch.
Digital Security Teammates offer a third path: AI-native automation that augments your existing team, provides 24/7 coverage, maintains human control, and delivers enterprise security without enterprise headcount.
For most growing businesses, Digital Security Teammates offer the fastest, most cost-effective path - providing MSSP-like 24/7 coverage and SOAR-like automation at $2.5K/month, with transparent AI operations and human-in-the-loop control.
For enterprises with mature security teams, Digital Security Teammates augment existing analysts with AI-powered triage, investigation, and response - freeing humans for strategic work. And unlike MSSPs running SOAR as a black box, Digital Security Teammates explain every decision with full audit trails.

With breaches averaging $4.88M and tool sprawl creating blind spots, this guide breaks down the four essential security tool categories every CISO needs to reduce risk, cut costs, and build a connected, high-impact stack.

Discover how simulating lateral movement with attack path analysis helps security teams identify and neutralize potential routes to crown jewel systems before attackers can exploit them.

While vulnerability scanning tells you what's broken, attack path modeling reveals what's actually dangerous by showing how attackers could chain exploits to reach your crown jewels.