SOAR vs SIEM: What's the Difference?
SIEM detects threats through log analysis while SOAR automates response—together they create a powerful defense that cuts incident response times from hours to minutes.
SIEM detects threats through log analysis while SOAR automates response—together they create a powerful defense that cuts incident response times from hours to minutes.

One important issue that SIEM addresses is detection and visibility—it does this by gathering and studying logs related to security. SOAR, on the other hand, focuses on response and automation by orchestrating workflows for incidents across various tools. When used together, these technologies can decrease mean time to respond (MTTR) by an impressive 45–55%.
A financial institution's security operations team was overwhelmed, drowning in alerts. They were getting 15,000 security warnings every single hour, and most were just false alarms.
Because of this, analysts spent their days figuring out which alerts needed attention: they jumped between tools and had to write down everything they did.
As a result, important threats sometimes went unnoticed for hours—or even days. Then one of the managers had an idea: They connected their SIEM to a SOAR platform.
Incredible things happened. Response times changed dramatically: it was a matter of minutes, not hours. The team finally got to do some real threat hunting instead of endlessly chasing alerts.
This isn’t an isolated success story. More and more organizations around the world are realizing something key: SIEM and SOAR technologies together are better than apart. When combined, they create a truly powerful security operations capability.
An automation platform known as SOAR, which stands for Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response, automates tasks within security operations. Such a system links together various tools and data sources and then uses playbooks and workflows to determine how to respond. If given alerts from multiple sources, a SOAR platform can also take action using predefined patterns—and accomplish this without needing a person to intervene.
A SIEM system—or security information and event management system—is key to spotting cyber threats as they happen. It pulls together log data from devices and software on your network and in the cloud; correlates events; and provides real-time alerts along with compliance reports for regulators.
While both technologies strengthen security operations, they serve distinct purposes. SIEM tells you what's happening, while SOAR tells you what to do about it.

Secure.com addresses the critical gaps that traditional SIEM and SOAR solutions leave behind. While conventional platforms struggle with tool sprawl and manual processes, Secure.com delivers an AI-first, unified approach that optimizes both detection and response.
Secure.com includes a built-in SIEM module that aggregates and correlates events from endpoints, infrastructure, and integrated tools. Unlike legacy SIEM platforms that generate alert fatigue, Secure.com leverages AI-powered event correlation to dramatically reduce false positives while ensuring real threats rise to the top.
The platform features drag-and-drop workflow automation that rivals dedicated SOAR solutions. Security teams can build custom playbooks without coding—automating everything from identity control analysis to compliance case management. These workflows integrate with 500+ security tools through a modular, scalable architecture.
Secure.com deploys AI-powered Digital Security Teammates that handle real-time alerts, triage, investigation, and response—optimizing MTTD by 30-40% and MTTR by 45-55%. These Digital Security Teammates don't just automate tasks; they make intelligent decisions based on context, threat landscape, and business process workflows—always with human oversight for sensitive actions.
Traditional approaches force teams to manage separate SIEM and SOAR products, creating integration headaches and visibility gaps. Secure.com reduces tool sprawl by 50% by combining real-time visibility, automated response, compliance automation, and vulnerability management into one context-aware platform.
Built on microservices architecture, Secure.com scales effortlessly across cloud, SaaS, and hybrid environments. The platform automatically discovers and classifies assets, builds knowledge graphs, and provides attack surface visibility with real-time visual updates—capabilities that extend far beyond traditional SIEM/SOAR limitations.
SIEM systems use threat intelligence mostly for matching and detecting known bad activity through indicators present in logs. SOAR platforms enrich this process with added context. When a notification is triggered, SOAR draws information from multiple threat intelligence feeds to assess the alert’s severity in real-time based on indicators such as IP addresses or domains being part of cybercrime campaigns— all without needing human input.
SIEMs can become less efficient when there are more logs to process than they were designed for—necessitating expensive upgrades or additional hardware. SOAR is much simpler to expand because it deals with alerts rather than raw data. Cloud-based variants for either kind of platform offer better scalability; nevertheless, it is still important for teams to account for SIEM ingestion costs as well as the complexities involved in automating with SOAR while they develop.
SIEM plays an integral role in fulfilling compliance requirements by providing all audit information, reports, and logs as mandated by laws such as GDPR or PCI DSS. SOAR enhances this aspect by systematically responding to incidents, keeping accurate records, and generating audit trails. You can think of these two technologies not as replacements for one another but rather as covering all bases when it comes to process as well as real-time operational insight.
SIEM uses threat intel to correlate external indicators with internal activity and flag known attack patterns. SOAR manages what happens next—updating playbooks, sharing indicators, and feeding investigation results back into intel systems. Used together, they continuously improve both detection and response.
And so the question facing security teams isn't whether they should invest in SIEM or SOAR technology (you need them both), but more how best to integrate the two seamlessly into a single, coherent whole.
Start simply by ensuring good SIEM coverage to provide that all-important threat visibility; then add SOAR automation atop this foundation in order to amplify and scale your human defenders' abilities.
For those teams seeking an integrated solution enabling close-knit cooperation between detection, analysis, and response, platforms such as Secure.com offer a compelling choice– one system combining native SIEM, AI-assisted playbooks, plus automated incident workflows.

AI-powered automation transforms incident response by cutting MTTR by 45-55%, turning hours-long investigations into minutes through intelligent triage, automated root cause analysis, and self-healing remediation.

Ivanti releases emergency patches for two critical zero-day vulnerabilities in EPMM that enable unauthenticated remote code execution, with CISA mandating federal agencies to patch by February 1, 2026.

SOC automation transforms security operations by automating triage, investigation, and response—cutting manual work by 70% while reducing MTTR by 50%.